Consultations, Teaching Observations & Workshops

Individual Teaching Support

Looking to elevate your teaching? Need a sounding board for a new idea? Want to trouble-shoot a teaching challenge? The UTLC Individual Consult is personalized teaching support that works for you.

UTLC Consults are non-evaluative, personalized, and confidential. From course design and learning assessments to learning activities, the UTLC is your one-stop shop for exploring new approaches, revisiting classic strategies, and energizing your teaching practice. Request a consult today.

Popular Consultation Topics include:

  • Course Accessibility
  • Course Design and Development
  • Classroom and Course Management
  • Implementing Team-Based Learning
  • Integrating AI Literacy
  • Learner Engagement
  • Learning Analytics and Assessment
  • Reviewing Course Evaluations
  • Universal Design for Learning (UDL)
  • Using Case Studies

The UTLC offers workshop opportunities for academic departments tailored both in time and scope for departmental needs and projects. Below is a list of common workshop offerings that can be developed to fit your needs.

  • Course Accessibility
  • Course Design and Development
  • 100/200 Level Course Support
  • Generative AI
  • High Impact Practices and Student Engagement
  • Learning Analytics and Assessment
  • Student Development
  • Teaching Effectiveness
  • Team-Based Learning
  • Universal Design for Learning
  • Using Case Studies

Don’t see the workshop topic that you were looking for? No worries, just contact the UTLC (UTLC@uncg.edu) and we will create the workshop that fits your goals. 

UTLC Observations

Consider a course observations using standardized, research-based observation protocols. The UTLC offers two confidential course observations types: in-person course and Canvas course reviews (popular for online courses).

Course observations include:

  • Pre observation consult and strategy review
  • Use of research-based Course Observation Protocol (from the list below)
  • Post observation notes and strategy follow-up
  • Second observation to review strategy integration

Research-Based Course Observation Protocols

Classroom Observation Protocol for Undergraduate STEM (COPUS)

The Classroom Observation Protocol for Undergraduate STEM (COPUS) (Smith et al. 2013) is an internationally recognized tool that provides language and structure for observing student and instructor interaction in face-to-face courses. Useful for all course, regardless of discipline.

Learn more

Laboratory Observation Protocol for Undergraduate STEM (LOPUS)

The Laboratory Observation Protocol for Undergraduate STEM (LOPUS) (Velasco et al. 2016) is the corresponding lab-focused rubric to the COPUS. Useful for all courses, regardless of discipline, with active learning elements.

Learn more

Behavioral Engagement Related to Instruction (BERI)

The Behavioral Engagement Related to Instruction (BERI) (Lane and Harris 2015), focuses on student engagement and disengagement behaviors in in face-to-face courses. Useful for all disciplines.

Learn more

Student Participation Observation Tool (SPOT)

The Student Participation Observation Tool (SPOT) (Paul et al. 2018) was developed through an NSF grant. Focused on student and teacher activity and engagement, this rubric is useful for all disciplines.

Learn more

Teaching Dimensions Observation Protocol (TDOP)

The Teaching Dimensions Observation Protocol (TDOP) (Hora 2015, Hora et al. 2013) was also developed by an NSF grant. TDOP focuses on three dimensions instructional practice, teacher-student dialogue, and technology integration. Useful for all disciplines.

Learn more

Peer Review Options

Within the UNCG Teaching Effectiveness Policy, peer assessment, or peer review, of teaching is described as a process conducted by faculty peers that uses elements such as observation of instruction, review of teaching portfolios, and discussions regarding pedagogical goals and methods with the goal to both assess and develop a faculty member’s instructional skill and practice. In practice, peer assessment has had mixed results often due to a lack of consistency, structure, or support. Most instructors are not trained in providing peer assessment of teaching and feel ill-equipped for the nuances of provide direct feedback to a peer as a formative process. By developing a unit-level approach and structure to peer assessment, this approach can become a pivotal component of teaching effectiveness and the evaluation of teaching.

Below are a few examples of peer review. Additionally, the UTLC has compiled resources on deploying peer review, from rubrics to methods, that support faculty/instructors in the peer review process.

Department Peers

Reach out to someone in your department to attend one or more of your classroom sessions to give you feedback. (Please see additional resources below for sample peer review rubrics.)

UTLC – Classroom Observation

A staff member in the UTLC can work with you to schedule one or more classroom observations using the several evidence-based observation tools to provide feedback. (Learn more and make a request)

Online courses may be taught asynchronously through Canvas and/or use required synchronous, virtual sessions. The options below are flexible to adapt to the delivery of your course.

Online Course Review Conducted by Your Department ATS

Reach out to your Department Academic Technology Specialist (ATS) to conduct a brief online review of your course. (Who is my ATS?)

UTLC – Online Course Evaluation

A staff member in the UTLC can work with you to complete a brief review of your online course focusing on your specific concerns. Use our consultation form above to make a request.

UNCG Promotion and Tenure Policy Resources

Background literature, overview of evidence-based practices, resources, and rubrics for peer review are available with other Teaching Effectiveness resources.

Share This